Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:39
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
The $5 trillion company: Wall Street got more bullish on tech stocks this week - MarketWatch
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ryan Reynolds’ ‘Animal Friends’ Delayed to 2026 at Warner Bros. - The Hollywood Reporter
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What movies have not aged well?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
In your humble opinion, why does the narcissist mistake kindness for weakness in some people?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Yale’s new Google Home smart lock is here — but it costs more thanks to tariffs - The Verge
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Stocks Rise as Oil Fades and Fed Bets Sink Yields: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What would happen if the Earth stopped spinning for one minute?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.